Session
0
Games
0
Wins
--
Win Rate
0
Score
0
Killed
--
Accuracy
0
Shots
0
Hits
0
Ticks
Controls
SPD:
1x
Optimization Journey
67 iterations | 1.6% → 100% | Total LLM cost: $0.29
Leaderboard — Who Contributed What?
| Rank | Agent | Contribution | Peak WR | Cost | Iters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Human + Claude Code | +70.0 pp | 94% | $0 | 5 |
| 2 | Baseline heuristic | +24.0 pp | 24% | $0 | 1 |
| 3 | Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) | +4.0 pp | 98% | $0.22 | 57 |
| 4 | Veto lookahead (Claude) | +2.0 pp | 100% | $0 | 1 |
pp = percentage points of win rate improvement.
Human + Claude wrote the strategy shape (targeting, dodging, column clearing) — the biggest leap.
Llama 70B autonomously refined parameters over 57 iterations for $0.22.
The final 2% came from a veto lookahead (simulate 12 ticks, reject lethal moves) — $0 pure insight.
Human + Claude wrote the strategy shape (targeting, dodging, column clearing) — the biggest leap.
Llama 70B autonomously refined parameters over 57 iterations for $0.22.
The final 2% came from a veto lookahead (simulate 12 ticks, reject lethal moves) — $0 pure insight.
Breakthroughs
| Iter | Agent | WR | What changed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baseline | 24% | Naive: move toward invader, shoot |
| 2 | Human+Claude | 78% | Bottom-targeting, trajectory dodge |
| 3 | Human+Claude | 92% | Multi-bullet dodge, edge columns |
| 5 | Human+Claude | 94% | Wider fire threshold, faster aim |
| 13 | Llama 70B | 96% | Autonomous parameter refinement |
| 45 | Llama 70B | 98% | Adaptive fire cooldown, tracking |
| 67 | Veto system | 100% | 12-tick death simulation veto |
AI State
Human Leaderboard
Click PLAY to try — Arrow keys + Space